PushState Polyfills vs Modern JavaScript Frameworks with Built-in Polyfills

Developers should use pushState polyfills when building SPAs that require client-side routing and need to support older browsers like Internet Explorer 9 or earlier, which lack native History API support meets developers should use these frameworks when building web applications that need to support a wide range of browsers, including older versions, without sacrificing modern features. Here's our take.

PushState Polyfills

Nice Pick

Developers should use pushState polyfills when building SPAs that require client-side routing and need to support older browsers like Internet Explorer 9 or earlier, which lack native History API support

Pros

• This is crucial for ensuring a seamless user experience with bookmarkable URLs and proper back/forward navigation in legacy environments, such as enterprise applications or websites with a diverse user base
• Related to: html5-history-api, single-page-applications

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Modern JavaScript Frameworks with Built-in Polyfills

Developers should use these frameworks when building web applications that need to support a wide range of browsers, including older versions, without sacrificing modern features

Pros

• They are essential for enterprise applications, public-facing websites, or any project requiring broad accessibility, as they reduce the need for manual polyfill management and testing
• Related to: react, angular

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. PushState Polyfills is a library while Modern JavaScript Frameworks with Built-in Polyfills is a framework. We picked PushState Polyfills based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

PushState Polyfills wins

Based on overall popularity. PushState Polyfills is more widely used, but Modern JavaScript Frameworks with Built-in Polyfills excels in its own space.