PushState Routing vs Static Site Generation

Developers should learn PushState Routing when building SPAs that require smooth, app-like navigation without server round-trips, as it improves performance and user interaction meets developers should use ssg for content-heavy sites like blogs, documentation, portfolios, and marketing pages where content changes infrequently, as it offers superior performance, security (no server-side vulnerabilities), and low hosting costs. Here's our take.

PushState Routing

Nice Pick

Developers should learn PushState Routing when building SPAs that require smooth, app-like navigation without server round-trips, as it improves performance and user interaction

Pros

• It's essential for creating SEO-friendly web applications with clean URLs that can be shared and indexed by search engines, and it's widely used in frameworks like React Router and Vue Router for managing complex state and view transitions
• Related to: javascript, react-router

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Static Site Generation

Developers should use SSG for content-heavy sites like blogs, documentation, portfolios, and marketing pages where content changes infrequently, as it offers superior performance, security (no server-side vulnerabilities), and low hosting costs

Pros

• It's ideal for projects requiring SEO optimization, global scalability via CDNs, and simplified deployment workflows, especially when combined with modern frameworks like Next
• Related to: next-js, gatsby

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. PushState Routing is a concept while Static Site Generation is a methodology. We picked PushState Routing based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

PushState Routing wins

Based on overall popularity. PushState Routing is more widely used, but Static Site Generation excels in its own space.