QUIC vs HTTP/2

Developers should learn QUIC when building high-performance web applications, especially those requiring low-latency connections like video streaming, online gaming, or real-time communication services meets developers should learn and use http/2 when building modern web applications to enhance speed and user experience, especially for sites with many resources or high traffic. Here's our take.

QUIC

Nice Pick

Developers should learn QUIC when building high-performance web applications, especially those requiring low-latency connections like video streaming, online gaming, or real-time communication services

Pros

• It's particularly useful for optimizing mobile and unreliable network environments, as it reduces connection setup time and handles packet loss more efficiently than traditional TCP/TLS stacks
• Related to: http-3, tls-1-3

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

HTTP/2

Developers should learn and use HTTP/2 when building modern web applications to enhance speed and user experience, especially for sites with many resources or high traffic

Pros

• It is essential for performance-critical use cases like e-commerce platforms, streaming services, and real-time applications where reduced latency and efficient resource loading are crucial
• Related to: http-1-1, tls

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. QUIC is a protocol while HTTP/2 is a concept. We picked QUIC based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

QUIC wins

Based on overall popularity. QUIC is more widely used, but HTTP/2 excels in its own space.