Quil vs p5.js

Developers should learn Quil when working on creative coding, data art, or interactive installations in a Clojure environment, as it simplifies graphics programming with a concise, immutable API meets developers should learn p5. Here's our take.

Quil

Nice Pick

Developers should learn Quil when working on creative coding, data art, or interactive installations in a Clojure environment, as it simplifies graphics programming with a concise, immutable API

Pros

• It's ideal for rapid prototyping of visual experiments, educational tools for teaching programming concepts visually, or building artistic applications that benefit from Clojure's REPL-driven workflow
• Related to: clojure, processing

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

p5.js

Developers should learn p5

Pros

• js when creating interactive art, data visualizations, educational tools, or prototypes that require graphical output in web browsers
• Related to: javascript, html5-canvas

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Quil if: You want it's ideal for rapid prototyping of visual experiments, educational tools for teaching programming concepts visually, or building artistic applications that benefit from clojure's repl-driven workflow and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use p5.js if: You prioritize js when creating interactive art, data visualizations, educational tools, or prototypes that require graphical output in web browsers over what Quil offers.

The Bottom Line

Quil wins

Developers should learn Quil when working on creative coding, data art, or interactive installations in a Clojure environment, as it simplifies graphics programming with a concise, immutable API