Quil vs Processing

Developers should learn Quil when working on creative coding, data art, or interactive installations in a Clojure environment, as it simplifies graphics programming with a concise, immutable API meets developers should learn processing when working on projects involving generative art, data visualization, interactive installations, or educational tools for programming and design. Here's our take.

Quil

Nice Pick

Developers should learn Quil when working on creative coding, data art, or interactive installations in a Clojure environment, as it simplifies graphics programming with a concise, immutable API

Pros

• It's ideal for rapid prototyping of visual experiments, educational tools for teaching programming concepts visually, or building artistic applications that benefit from Clojure's REPL-driven workflow
• Related to: clojure, processing

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Processing

Developers should learn Processing when working on projects involving generative art, data visualization, interactive installations, or educational tools for programming and design

Pros

• It is particularly useful for quickly sketching visual ideas, creating interactive prototypes, or teaching programming concepts in a visual context
• Related to: java, creative-coding

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Quil is a library while Processing is a framework. We picked Quil based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Quil wins

Based on overall popularity. Quil is more widely used, but Processing excels in its own space.