Quill vs TinyMCE

Developers should use Quill when they need a flexible and feature-rich text editor for web applications, such as content management systems, blogging platforms, or collaborative tools, without the bloat of larger alternatives meets developers should use tinymce when building web applications that require rich-text editing capabilities, such as cms dashboards, blog editors, or admin panels where users need to create formatted content. Here's our take.

Quill

Nice Pick

Developers should use Quill when they need a flexible and feature-rich text editor for web applications, such as content management systems, blogging platforms, or collaborative tools, without the bloat of larger alternatives

Pros

• It is ideal for projects requiring custom formatting, real-time collaboration, or seamless integration with modern JavaScript frameworks, as it provides extensive documentation and a modular plugin system for tailored solutions
• Related to: javascript, react

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

TinyMCE

Developers should use TinyMCE when building web applications that require rich-text editing capabilities, such as CMS dashboards, blog editors, or admin panels where users need to create formatted content

Pros

• It is particularly valuable for projects that prioritize ease of integration, customization, and accessibility, as it offers extensive APIs, plugins, and themes to tailor the editor to specific needs
• Related to: javascript, html

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Quill is a library while TinyMCE is a tool. We picked Quill based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Quill wins

Based on overall popularity. Quill is more widely used, but TinyMCE excels in its own space.