Raw SQL vs Query Builder

Developers should use Raw SQL when they need to write complex queries that ORMs cannot handle efficiently, such as advanced joins, subqueries, or database-specific functions like window functions in PostgreSQL meets developers should use a query builder when building database-driven applications that require dynamic or complex queries, as it enhances security by automatically escaping inputs and reduces the risk of sql injection. Here's our take.

Raw SQL

Nice Pick

Developers should use Raw SQL when they need to write complex queries that ORMs cannot handle efficiently, such as advanced joins, subqueries, or database-specific functions like window functions in PostgreSQL

Pros

• It is also essential for performance-critical applications where query optimization is crucial, and for tasks like database migrations or reporting that require precise control over SQL execution
• Related to: sql, relational-databases

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Query Builder

Developers should use a Query Builder when building database-driven applications that require dynamic or complex queries, as it enhances security by automatically escaping inputs and reduces the risk of SQL injection

Pros

• It is particularly useful in scenarios where queries need to be constructed based on runtime conditions, such as in search filters or reporting tools, and when working in teams to maintain consistent and maintainable code
• Related to: sql, orm

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Raw SQL is a concept while Query Builder is a tool. We picked Raw SQL based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Raw SQL wins

Based on overall popularity. Raw SQL is more widely used, but Query Builder excels in its own space.