Reliable Messaging vs Unreliable Messaging
Developers should learn and implement Reliable Messaging when building systems that require high data integrity and consistency, such as e-commerce order processing, banking transactions, or real-time analytics pipelines meets developers should use unreliable messaging when building applications that require minimal latency and can tolerate some data loss, such as live video/audio streaming, online multiplayer games, or iot sensor data where timeliness is critical. Here's our take.
Reliable Messaging
Developers should learn and implement Reliable Messaging when building systems that require high data integrity and consistency, such as e-commerce order processing, banking transactions, or real-time analytics pipelines
Reliable Messaging
Nice PickDevelopers should learn and implement Reliable Messaging when building systems that require high data integrity and consistency, such as e-commerce order processing, banking transactions, or real-time analytics pipelines
Pros
- +It is crucial in scenarios where message loss or duplication could lead to critical errors, like double-charging customers or corrupted data states, ensuring that applications remain robust under unreliable network conditions
- +Related to: message-queues, event-driven-architecture
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
Unreliable Messaging
Developers should use unreliable messaging when building applications that require minimal latency and can tolerate some data loss, such as live video/audio streaming, online multiplayer games, or IoT sensor data where timeliness is critical
Pros
- +It reduces overhead compared to reliable protocols like TCP, making it suitable for high-frequency, low-priority data where retransmissions would be inefficient or disruptive
- +Related to: udp, distributed-systems
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
Use Reliable Messaging if: You want it is crucial in scenarios where message loss or duplication could lead to critical errors, like double-charging customers or corrupted data states, ensuring that applications remain robust under unreliable network conditions and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.
Use Unreliable Messaging if: You prioritize it reduces overhead compared to reliable protocols like tcp, making it suitable for high-frequency, low-priority data where retransmissions would be inefficient or disruptive over what Reliable Messaging offers.
Developers should learn and implement Reliable Messaging when building systems that require high data integrity and consistency, such as e-commerce order processing, banking transactions, or real-time analytics pipelines
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev