Dynamic

Remix vs Astro

React's full-stack framework that actually makes server-side rendering fun, not a chore meets the framework that finally gets it: less javascript is more, especially when you can still use all your favorite toys. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

Remix

React's full-stack framework that actually makes server-side rendering fun, not a chore.

Remix

Nice Pick

React's full-stack framework that actually makes server-side rendering fun, not a chore.

Pros

  • +Built-in data loading and mutations with seamless server-client integration
  • +Progressive enhancement out of the box for better resilience and performance
  • +Excellent error handling and web standards compliance

Cons

  • -Steep learning curve if you're used to client-side-only React frameworks
  • -Requires a Node.js server, which can complicate deployment compared to static hosting

Astro

The framework that finally gets it: less JavaScript is more, especially when you can still use all your favorite toys.

Pros

  • +Zero JavaScript by default for lightning-fast static sites
  • +Mix and match React, Vue, or Svelte components without framework lock-in
  • +Excellent SEO and performance out of the box
  • +Built-in support for islands architecture for partial hydration

Cons

  • -Can feel overkill for simple projects due to its component-heavy approach
  • -Limited real-time interactivity without manual JavaScript additions

The Verdict

Use Remix if: You want built-in data loading and mutations with seamless server-client integration and can live with steep learning curve if you're used to client-side-only react frameworks.

Use Astro if: You prioritize zero javascript by default for lightning-fast static sites over what Remix offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
Remix wins

React's full-stack framework that actually makes server-side rendering fun, not a chore.

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev