Dynamic

Remix vs Next.js

React's full-stack framework that actually makes server-side rendering fun, not a chore meets react's opinionated best friend. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

Remix

React's full-stack framework that actually makes server-side rendering fun, not a chore.

Remix

Nice Pick

React's full-stack framework that actually makes server-side rendering fun, not a chore.

Pros

  • +Built-in data loading and mutations with seamless server-client integration
  • +Progressive enhancement out of the box for better resilience and performance
  • +Excellent error handling and web standards compliance

Cons

  • -Steep learning curve if you're used to client-side-only React frameworks
  • -Requires a Node.js server, which can complicate deployment compared to static hosting

Next.js

React's opinionated best friend. All the server-side rendering, none of the excuses.

Pros

  • +Built-in server-side rendering and static site generation
  • +File-based routing that's actually intuitive
  • +Automatic code splitting for better performance
  • +Seamless API routes for backend logic

Cons

  • -Can feel bloated for simple projects
  • -Learning curve with its opinionated structure

The Verdict

Use Remix if: You want built-in data loading and mutations with seamless server-client integration and can live with steep learning curve if you're used to client-side-only react frameworks.

Use Next.js if: You prioritize built-in server-side rendering and static site generation over what Remix offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
Remix wins

React's full-stack framework that actually makes server-side rendering fun, not a chore.

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev