Heroku vs Render
The platform that defined PaaS vs the one that wants to replace it. Heroku killed its free tier. Render didn't.
Render
Heroku lost the plot when they killed the free tier without improving the paid experience. Render offers the same git-push-deploy simplicity with a free tier that actually exists, better pricing, and modern features. The Heroku tax is no longer worth paying.
Heroku's Fall From Grace
Heroku defined platform-as-a-service. Git push, app deploys. It was magic in 2010. Then Salesforce bought them, the free tier died (November 2022), the platform stagnated, and developers left.
The paid tiers didn't get better. The cheapest Heroku dyno is $5/month for a service that sleeps. A production-grade dyno is $25/month. Postgres starts at $5/month for 10K rows (seriously). These prices were reasonable in 2015. They're insulting in 2026.
Render's Value Proposition
Render offers a free tier with 750 hours/month. Services sleep after 15 minutes of inactivity (like old Heroku), but they exist. For hobby projects and prototypes, that matters.
Paid plans start at $7/month for a service that never sleeps. Managed PostgreSQL starts at $7/month with 1GB storage. Background workers, cron jobs, static sites — all supported with simpler pricing than Heroku.
The Cold Start Problem
Render's free tier sleeps aggressively. First request after idle can take 30+ seconds to spin up. This is the same problem old Heroku free tier had.
For anything customer-facing, you need a paid plan. But at $7/month vs Heroku's $25/month for equivalent always-on compute, Render is a third of the price.
What Heroku Still Does Better
Heroku's addon marketplace is unmatched. Redis, Elasticsearch, monitoring, logging — one-click addons that provision and inject credentials automatically. Render has some managed services but nothing close to Heroku's breadth.
Heroku Pipelines (staging → production promotion) and Review Apps (ephemeral apps per PR) are also excellent. Render has preview environments but they're less mature.
If you're an enterprise with existing Heroku infrastructure and Salesforce integration, the switching cost may not be worth it.
The Migration Path
Most Heroku apps migrate to Render in under an hour. Same git-push deployment model, similar environment variable management, similar build processes.
The main gotcha: Heroku Procfiles work on Render but some buildpack-specific features don't translate. Docker-based deploys are the safest migration path if your app has custom build steps.
Quick Comparison
| Factor | Heroku | Render |
|---|---|---|
| Free Tier | None (removed 2022) | 750 hours/month |
| Cheapest Always-On | $25/month (Standard-1X) | $7/month (Starter) |
| Managed Postgres | $5/month (10K rows limit) | $7/month (1GB) |
| Addon Ecosystem | Excellent (200+) | Limited |
| Review Apps | Excellent | Preview environments |
| Deploy Speed | Moderate | Fast |
| Docker Support | Yes | Yes (native) |
| Static Sites | Not supported | Free, built-in CDN |
The Verdict
Use Heroku if: You're an enterprise deeply integrated with Salesforce, need Heroku's addon marketplace, or have legacy apps that aren't worth migrating.
Use Render if: You're starting a new project, you're cost-conscious, or you're migrating from Heroku's dead free tier.
Consider: Also look at Railway ($5 credit/month, better DX) and Fly.io (edge deployment, Docker-native) depending on your needs.
Heroku lost the plot when they killed the free tier without improving the paid experience. Render offers the same git-push-deploy simplicity with a free tier that actually exists, better pricing, and modern features. The Heroku tax is no longer worth paying.
Related Comparisons
Disagree? nice@nicepick.dev