Requirements Based Testing vs Exploratory Testing

Developers should use Requirements Based Testing when working on projects with clear, documented requirements, such as in regulated industries (e meets developers should learn exploratory testing to complement automated and scripted testing, especially in agile environments where requirements evolve rapidly. Here's our take.

Requirements Based Testing

Nice Pick

Developers should use Requirements Based Testing when working on projects with clear, documented requirements, such as in regulated industries (e

Pros

• g
• Related to: test-case-design, acceptance-testing

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Exploratory Testing

Developers should learn exploratory testing to complement automated and scripted testing, especially in agile environments where requirements evolve rapidly

Pros

• It is crucial for testing user interfaces, new features, or complex integrations where unpredictable scenarios arise, helping to ensure software quality beyond basic functionality checks
• Related to: test-automation, manual-testing

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Requirements Based Testing if: You want g and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use Exploratory Testing if: You prioritize it is crucial for testing user interfaces, new features, or complex integrations where unpredictable scenarios arise, helping to ensure software quality beyond basic functionality checks over what Requirements Based Testing offers.

The Bottom Line

Requirements Based Testing wins

Developers should use Requirements Based Testing when working on projects with clear, documented requirements, such as in regulated industries (e