Requirements Based Testing vs Risk Based Testing

Developers should use Requirements Based Testing when working on projects with clear, documented requirements, such as in regulated industries (e meets developers and testers should use risk based testing when working on projects with limited time, budget, or resources, as it maximizes test coverage for the most critical parts of the software. Here's our take.

Requirements Based Testing

Nice Pick

Developers should use Requirements Based Testing when working on projects with clear, documented requirements, such as in regulated industries (e

Pros

• g
• Related to: test-case-design, acceptance-testing

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Risk Based Testing

Developers and testers should use Risk Based Testing when working on projects with limited time, budget, or resources, as it maximizes test coverage for the most critical parts of the software

Pros

• It is particularly valuable in agile or fast-paced environments, safety-critical systems (e
• Related to: test-planning, risk-assessment

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Requirements Based Testing if: You want g and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use Risk Based Testing if: You prioritize it is particularly valuable in agile or fast-paced environments, safety-critical systems (e over what Requirements Based Testing offers.

The Bottom Line

Requirements Based Testing wins

Developers should use Requirements Based Testing when working on projects with clear, documented requirements, such as in regulated industries (e