Resistance To Change vs Continuous Improvement

Developers should learn about resistance to change to effectively manage team adoption of new technologies (e meets developers should adopt continuous improvement to foster a culture of excellence, reduce waste, and adapt quickly to changing requirements in agile environments. Here's our take.

Resistance To Change

Nice Pick

Developers should learn about resistance to change to effectively manage team adoption of new technologies (e

Pros

• g
• Related to: change-management, organizational-psychology

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Continuous Improvement

Developers should adopt Continuous Improvement to foster a culture of excellence, reduce waste, and adapt quickly to changing requirements in agile environments

Pros

• It is particularly valuable in DevOps practices for streamlining deployment pipelines, in software development for refining code quality through regular refactoring, and in product teams for iteratively enhancing user experience based on feedback
• Related to: lean-methodology, six-sigma

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Resistance To Change is a concept while Continuous Improvement is a methodology. We picked Resistance To Change based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Resistance To Change wins

Based on overall popularity. Resistance To Change is more widely used, but Continuous Improvement excels in its own space.