Dynamic
Rider vs MonoDevelop
Developers should use Rider when working on meets developers should learn monodevelop when working on cross-platform . Here's our take.
🧊Nice Pick
Rider
Developers should use Rider when working on
Rider
Nice PickDevelopers should use Rider when working on
Pros
- +NET projects, especially in cross-platform environments, as it provides a unified experience on Windows, macOS, and Linux
- +Related to: c-sharp, unity
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
MonoDevelop
Developers should learn MonoDevelop when working on cross-platform
Pros
- +NET applications, especially in Linux or macOS environments where Visual Studio might not be available
- +Related to: c-sharp, dotnet-framework
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
Use Rider if: You want net projects, especially in cross-platform environments, as it provides a unified experience on windows, macos, and linux and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.
Use MonoDevelop if: You prioritize net applications, especially in linux or macos environments where visual studio might not be available over what Rider offers.
🧊
The Bottom Line
Rider wins
Developers should use Rider when working on
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev