Dynamic

Rider vs MonoDevelop

Developers should use Rider when working on meets developers should learn monodevelop when working on cross-platform . Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

Rider

Developers should use Rider when working on

Rider

Nice Pick

Developers should use Rider when working on

Pros

  • +NET projects, especially in cross-platform environments, as it provides a unified experience on Windows, macOS, and Linux
  • +Related to: c-sharp, unity

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

MonoDevelop

Developers should learn MonoDevelop when working on cross-platform

Pros

  • +NET applications, especially in Linux or macOS environments where Visual Studio might not be available
  • +Related to: c-sharp, dotnet-framework

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Rider if: You want net projects, especially in cross-platform environments, as it provides a unified experience on windows, macos, and linux and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use MonoDevelop if: You prioritize net applications, especially in linux or macos environments where visual studio might not be available over what Rider offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
Rider wins

Developers should use Rider when working on

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev