RPM Package Manager vs dpkg
Developers should learn RPM when working with or deploying applications on RPM-based Linux distributions, as it is the standard tool for managing system software and dependencies meets developers should learn dpkg when working with debian-based systems for direct package manipulation, such as installing local . Here's our take.
RPM Package Manager
Developers should learn RPM when working with or deploying applications on RPM-based Linux distributions, as it is the standard tool for managing system software and dependencies
RPM Package Manager
Nice PickDevelopers should learn RPM when working with or deploying applications on RPM-based Linux distributions, as it is the standard tool for managing system software and dependencies
Pros
- +It is essential for creating, distributing, and maintaining software packages in enterprise environments, automating deployments, and ensuring reproducible builds
- +Related to: linux-system-administration, yum
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
dpkg
Developers should learn dpkg when working with Debian-based systems for direct package manipulation, such as installing local
Pros
- +deb files, troubleshooting package issues, or automating deployments
- +Related to: apt, debian
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
Use RPM Package Manager if: You want it is essential for creating, distributing, and maintaining software packages in enterprise environments, automating deployments, and ensuring reproducible builds and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.
Use dpkg if: You prioritize deb files, troubleshooting package issues, or automating deployments over what RPM Package Manager offers.
Developers should learn RPM when working with or deploying applications on RPM-based Linux distributions, as it is the standard tool for managing system software and dependencies
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev