Rpmbuild vs dpkg
Developers should learn Rpmbuild when creating or maintaining software for RPM-based Linux distributions, as it ensures packages are built consistently and meet distribution standards meets developers should learn dpkg when working with debian-based systems for direct package manipulation, such as installing local . Here's our take.
Rpmbuild
Developers should learn Rpmbuild when creating or maintaining software for RPM-based Linux distributions, as it ensures packages are built consistently and meet distribution standards
Rpmbuild
Nice PickDevelopers should learn Rpmbuild when creating or maintaining software for RPM-based Linux distributions, as it ensures packages are built consistently and meet distribution standards
Pros
- +It is essential for system administrators, DevOps engineers, and open-source contributors who need to package software for deployment, updates, or inclusion in repositories like EPEL
- +Related to: rpm, spec-file
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
dpkg
Developers should learn dpkg when working with Debian-based systems for direct package manipulation, such as installing local
Pros
- +deb files, troubleshooting package issues, or automating deployments
- +Related to: apt, debian
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
Use Rpmbuild if: You want it is essential for system administrators, devops engineers, and open-source contributors who need to package software for deployment, updates, or inclusion in repositories like epel and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.
Use dpkg if: You prioritize deb files, troubleshooting package issues, or automating deployments over what Rpmbuild offers.
Developers should learn Rpmbuild when creating or maintaining software for RPM-based Linux distributions, as it ensures packages are built consistently and meet distribution standards
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev