Runtime Inclusion vs Static Linking
Developers should use runtime inclusion when building extensible applications that need to support plugins, load configuration-based modules, or reduce initial startup overhead by deferring resource loading meets developers should use static linking when creating portable, self-contained applications that need to run reliably across different systems without dependency issues, such as in embedded systems, cross-platform tools, or deployment to environments with strict library version controls. Here's our take.
Runtime Inclusion
Developers should use runtime inclusion when building extensible applications that need to support plugins, load configuration-based modules, or reduce initial startup overhead by deferring resource loading
Runtime Inclusion
Nice PickDevelopers should use runtime inclusion when building extensible applications that need to support plugins, load configuration-based modules, or reduce initial startup overhead by deferring resource loading
Pros
- +It is essential in frameworks that support hot-reloading, microservices with dynamic service discovery, or applications requiring conditional feature activation based on runtime conditions
- +Related to: dependency-injection, reflection
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
Static Linking
Developers should use static linking when creating portable, self-contained applications that need to run reliably across different systems without dependency issues, such as in embedded systems, cross-platform tools, or deployment to environments with strict library version controls
Pros
- +It is also beneficial for performance-critical applications where the overhead of dynamic library loading is undesirable, though it increases binary size
- +Related to: compilation, linker
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
Use Runtime Inclusion if: You want it is essential in frameworks that support hot-reloading, microservices with dynamic service discovery, or applications requiring conditional feature activation based on runtime conditions and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.
Use Static Linking if: You prioritize it is also beneficial for performance-critical applications where the overhead of dynamic library loading is undesirable, though it increases binary size over what Runtime Inclusion offers.
Developers should use runtime inclusion when building extensible applications that need to support plugins, load configuration-based modules, or reduce initial startup overhead by deferring resource loading
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev