Dynamic

Runtime Linking vs Static Linking

Developers should learn runtime linking for building modular and extensible software, such as applications with plugin architectures, games with mod support, or systems requiring hot-swappable components meets developers should use static linking when creating portable, self-contained applications that need to run reliably across different systems without dependency issues, such as in embedded systems, cross-platform tools, or deployment to environments with strict library version controls. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

Runtime Linking

Developers should learn runtime linking for building modular and extensible software, such as applications with plugin architectures, games with mod support, or systems requiring hot-swappable components

Runtime Linking

Nice Pick

Developers should learn runtime linking for building modular and extensible software, such as applications with plugin architectures, games with mod support, or systems requiring hot-swappable components

Pros

  • +It is essential in scenarios where code needs to be updated or loaded on-demand, like in web servers handling dynamic modules or mobile apps downloading features post-installation, as it improves flexibility and resource efficiency
  • +Related to: dynamic-link-library, shared-object

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Static Linking

Developers should use static linking when creating portable, self-contained applications that need to run reliably across different systems without dependency issues, such as in embedded systems, cross-platform tools, or deployment to environments with strict library version controls

Pros

  • +It is also beneficial for performance-critical applications where the overhead of dynamic library loading is undesirable, though it increases binary size
  • +Related to: compilation, linker

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Runtime Linking if: You want it is essential in scenarios where code needs to be updated or loaded on-demand, like in web servers handling dynamic modules or mobile apps downloading features post-installation, as it improves flexibility and resource efficiency and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use Static Linking if: You prioritize it is also beneficial for performance-critical applications where the overhead of dynamic library loading is undesirable, though it increases binary size over what Runtime Linking offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
Runtime Linking wins

Developers should learn runtime linking for building modular and extensible software, such as applications with plugin architectures, games with mod support, or systems requiring hot-swappable components

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev