Rust vs C
Developers should learn Rust when building high-performance, reliable systems where memory safety and thread safety are critical, such as embedded systems, blockchain platforms, or web assembly modules meets c is widely used in the industry and worth learning. Here's our take.
Rust
Developers should learn Rust when building high-performance, reliable systems where memory safety and thread safety are critical, such as embedded systems, blockchain platforms, or web assembly modules
Rust
Nice PickDevelopers should learn Rust when building high-performance, reliable systems where memory safety and thread safety are critical, such as embedded systems, blockchain platforms, or web assembly modules
Pros
- +It's ideal for projects that require low-level control without sacrificing safety, often replacing C or C++ in modern development
- +Related to: systems-programming, web-assembly
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
C
C is widely used in the industry and worth learning
Pros
- +Widely used in the industry
- +Related to: various technologies
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
Use Rust if: You want it's ideal for projects that require low-level control without sacrificing safety, often replacing c or c++ in modern development and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.
Use C if: You prioritize widely used in the industry over what Rust offers.
Developers should learn Rust when building high-performance, reliable systems where memory safety and thread safety are critical, such as embedded systems, blockchain platforms, or web assembly modules
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev