SaaS Monitoring vs Self-Hosted Monitoring

Developers should learn SaaS Monitoring when building or maintaining cloud-native applications, microservices architectures, or distributed systems that require scalable, automated observability meets developers should learn and use self-hosted monitoring when they need to maintain data sovereignty, comply with strict regulatory requirements (e. Here's our take.

SaaS Monitoring

Nice Pick

Developers should learn SaaS Monitoring when building or maintaining cloud-native applications, microservices architectures, or distributed systems that require scalable, automated observability

Pros

• It is crucial for DevOps and SRE teams to ensure high availability, troubleshoot issues quickly, and meet service-level agreements (SLAs) in dynamic environments
• Related to: observability, apm

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Self-Hosted Monitoring

Developers should learn and use self-hosted monitoring when they need to maintain data sovereignty, comply with strict regulatory requirements (e

Pros

• g
• Related to: prometheus, grafana

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. SaaS Monitoring is a platform while Self-Hosted Monitoring is a tool. We picked SaaS Monitoring based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

SaaS Monitoring wins

Based on overall popularity. SaaS Monitoring is more widely used, but Self-Hosted Monitoring excels in its own space.