Scala Macros vs Shapeless

Developers should learn Scala Macros when building libraries or frameworks that require compile-time code generation, such as serialization libraries (e meets developers should learn shapeless when building scala applications that require advanced type-level programming, such as automatic derivation of type classes (e. Here's our take.

Scala Macros

Nice Pick

Developers should learn Scala Macros when building libraries or frameworks that require compile-time code generation, such as serialization libraries (e

Pros

• g
• Related to: scala, metaprogramming

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Shapeless

Developers should learn Shapeless when building Scala applications that require advanced type-level programming, such as automatic derivation of type classes (e

Pros

• g
• Related to: scala, functional-programming

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Scala Macros is a concept while Shapeless is a library. We picked Scala Macros based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Scala Macros wins

Based on overall popularity. Scala Macros is more widely used, but Shapeless excels in its own space.