Scripted Provisioning vs Cloud Native Tools

Developers should learn scripted provisioning to automate infrastructure setup for development, testing, and production environments, especially in scenarios requiring frequent deployments or scaling meets developers should learn cloud native tools to build applications that are scalable, fault-tolerant, and easily deployable in modern cloud infrastructures, such as for microservices-based systems or serverless computing. Here's our take.

Scripted Provisioning

Nice Pick

Developers should learn scripted provisioning to automate infrastructure setup for development, testing, and production environments, especially in scenarios requiring frequent deployments or scaling

Pros

• It is crucial for implementing Infrastructure as Code (IaC) principles, reducing configuration drift, and improving collaboration between development and operations teams
• Related to: infrastructure-as-code, configuration-management

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Cloud Native Tools

Developers should learn Cloud Native Tools to build applications that are scalable, fault-tolerant, and easily deployable in modern cloud infrastructures, such as for microservices-based systems or serverless computing

Pros

• They are essential in industries like e-commerce, fintech, and SaaS where high availability and rapid iteration are critical, as these tools automate deployment, scaling, and management tasks
• Related to: kubernetes, docker

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Scripted Provisioning is a methodology while Cloud Native Tools is a tool. We picked Scripted Provisioning based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Scripted Provisioning wins

Based on overall popularity. Scripted Provisioning is more widely used, but Cloud Native Tools excels in its own space.