Scripted Testing vs Ad Hoc Testing

Developers should learn scripted testing when working on projects requiring high reliability, compliance with standards (e meets developers should use ad hoc testing during early development phases, after bug fixes, or when rapid feedback is needed, as it helps uncover unexpected issues and usability problems. Here's our take.

Scripted Testing

Nice Pick

Developers should learn scripted testing when working on projects requiring high reliability, compliance with standards (e

Pros

• g
• Related to: test-automation, regression-testing

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Ad Hoc Testing

Developers should use ad hoc testing during early development phases, after bug fixes, or when rapid feedback is needed, as it helps uncover unexpected issues and usability problems

Pros

• It's particularly valuable for exploratory testing to understand application behavior, complementing formal testing methods like unit or integration tests
• Related to: exploratory-testing, manual-testing

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Scripted Testing if: You want g and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use Ad Hoc Testing if: You prioritize it's particularly valuable for exploratory testing to understand application behavior, complementing formal testing methods like unit or integration tests over what Scripted Testing offers.

The Bottom Line

Scripted Testing wins

Developers should learn scripted testing when working on projects requiring high reliability, compliance with standards (e