Secure By Design vs Security As An Afterthought

Developers should adopt Secure By Design when building critical applications, such as those handling sensitive data (e meets developers should avoid this concept by learning secure coding practices and integrating security early, as it causes critical flaws like injection attacks, data leaks, and compliance failures in applications. Here's our take.

Secure By Design

Nice Pick

Developers should adopt Secure By Design when building critical applications, such as those handling sensitive data (e

Pros

• g
• Related to: threat-modeling, secure-coding-practices

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Security As An Afterthought

Developers should avoid this concept by learning secure coding practices and integrating security early, as it causes critical flaws like injection attacks, data leaks, and compliance failures in applications

Pros

• Understanding this anti-pattern is essential for building resilient systems, especially in industries like finance, healthcare, or e-commerce where security is paramount
• Related to: secure-coding, devsecops

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Secure By Design is a methodology while Security As An Afterthought is a concept. We picked Secure By Design based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Secure By Design wins

Based on overall popularity. Secure By Design is more widely used, but Security As An Afterthought excels in its own space.