Security As A Bolt On vs Shift Left Security
Developers should learn about this concept to understand why it's problematic and avoid it in practice, as it can result in insecure software, increased technical debt, and costly fixes post-deployment meets developers should adopt shift left security to build more secure applications from the ground up, as it helps catch vulnerabilities early when they are cheaper and easier to fix, reducing the likelihood of costly breaches or rework. Here's our take.
Security As A Bolt On
Developers should learn about this concept to understand why it's problematic and avoid it in practice, as it can result in insecure software, increased technical debt, and costly fixes post-deployment
Security As A Bolt On
Nice PickDevelopers should learn about this concept to understand why it's problematic and avoid it in practice, as it can result in insecure software, increased technical debt, and costly fixes post-deployment
Pros
- +It's particularly relevant in scenarios where rapid development or legacy systems lead to security being neglected, such as in startups or when maintaining older codebases
- +Related to: devsecops, security-by-design
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
Shift Left Security
Developers should adopt Shift Left Security to build more secure applications from the ground up, as it helps catch vulnerabilities early when they are cheaper and easier to fix, reducing the likelihood of costly breaches or rework
Pros
- +It is particularly valuable in agile and DevOps environments where rapid development cycles require continuous security integration, such as in cloud-native applications, microservices architectures, or compliance-driven industries like finance and healthcare
- +Related to: devsecops, static-application-security-testing
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
Use Security As A Bolt On if: You want it's particularly relevant in scenarios where rapid development or legacy systems lead to security being neglected, such as in startups or when maintaining older codebases and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.
Use Shift Left Security if: You prioritize it is particularly valuable in agile and devops environments where rapid development cycles require continuous security integration, such as in cloud-native applications, microservices architectures, or compliance-driven industries like finance and healthcare over what Security As A Bolt On offers.
Developers should learn about this concept to understand why it's problematic and avoid it in practice, as it can result in insecure software, increased technical debt, and costly fixes post-deployment
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev