Security As Afterthought vs DevSecOps

Developers should learn about this concept to understand the risks and inefficiencies of delaying security, as it often results in increased technical debt, higher remediation costs, and greater exposure to breaches meets developers should adopt devsecops to enhance application security, reduce risks from data breaches, and meet regulatory requirements like gdpr or hipaa, especially in industries like finance or healthcare. Here's our take.

Security As Afterthought

Nice Pick

Developers should learn about this concept to understand the risks and inefficiencies of delaying security, as it often results in increased technical debt, higher remediation costs, and greater exposure to breaches

Pros

• It is critical in contexts like legacy systems, rapid prototyping, or when teams lack security expertise, highlighting the need for early integration of security measures
• Related to: devsecops, secure-coding

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

DevSecOps

Developers should adopt DevSecOps to enhance application security, reduce risks from data breaches, and meet regulatory requirements like GDPR or HIPAA, especially in industries like finance or healthcare

Pros

• It's crucial for modern cloud-native and microservices architectures where traditional security models fall short, enabling faster and safer deployments through automated security testing and monitoring
• Related to: devops, continuous-integration

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Security As Afterthought is a concept while DevSecOps is a methodology. We picked Security As Afterthought based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Security As Afterthought wins

Based on overall popularity. Security As Afterthought is more widely used, but DevSecOps excels in its own space.