Security As Afterthought vs Secure By Design

Developers should learn about this concept to understand the risks and inefficiencies of delaying security, as it often results in increased technical debt, higher remediation costs, and greater exposure to breaches meets developers should adopt secure by design when building critical applications, such as those handling sensitive data (e. Here's our take.

Security As Afterthought

Nice Pick

Developers should learn about this concept to understand the risks and inefficiencies of delaying security, as it often results in increased technical debt, higher remediation costs, and greater exposure to breaches

Pros

• It is critical in contexts like legacy systems, rapid prototyping, or when teams lack security expertise, highlighting the need for early integration of security measures
• Related to: devsecops, secure-coding

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Secure By Design

Developers should adopt Secure By Design when building critical applications, such as those handling sensitive data (e

Pros

• g
• Related to: threat-modeling, secure-coding-practices

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Security As Afterthought is a concept while Secure By Design is a methodology. We picked Security As Afterthought based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Security As Afterthought wins

Based on overall popularity. Security As Afterthought is more widely used, but Secure By Design excels in its own space.