Security As An Afterthought vs Secure By Design

Developers should avoid this concept by learning secure coding practices and integrating security early, as it causes critical flaws like injection attacks, data leaks, and compliance failures in applications meets developers should adopt secure by design when building critical applications, such as those handling sensitive data (e. Here's our take.

Security As An Afterthought

Nice Pick

Developers should avoid this concept by learning secure coding practices and integrating security early, as it causes critical flaws like injection attacks, data leaks, and compliance failures in applications

Pros

• Understanding this anti-pattern is essential for building resilient systems, especially in industries like finance, healthcare, or e-commerce where security is paramount
• Related to: secure-coding, devsecops

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Secure By Design

Developers should adopt Secure By Design when building critical applications, such as those handling sensitive data (e

Pros

• g
• Related to: threat-modeling, secure-coding-practices

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Security As An Afterthought is a concept while Secure By Design is a methodology. We picked Security As An Afterthought based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Security As An Afterthought wins

Based on overall popularity. Security As An Afterthought is more widely used, but Secure By Design excels in its own space.