Security Automation vs Security Through Obscurity

Developers should learn and use Security Automation to enhance application and infrastructure security while maintaining development speed, particularly in DevOps and cloud-native environments meets developers might use security through obscurity as a supplementary measure in scenarios like protecting proprietary algorithms or delaying attackers in low-risk environments, but it should never be the sole security mechanism. Here's our take.

Security Automation

Nice Pick

Developers should learn and use Security Automation to enhance application and infrastructure security while maintaining development speed, particularly in DevOps and cloud-native environments

Pros

• It is crucial for automating repetitive security checks, such as scanning code for vulnerabilities, enforcing security policies in deployments, and responding to security incidents quickly
• Related to: devsecops, ci-cd-pipelines

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Security Through Obscurity

Developers might use security through obscurity as a supplementary measure in scenarios like protecting proprietary algorithms or delaying attackers in low-risk environments, but it should never be the sole security mechanism

Pros

• It is specifically discouraged for critical systems, such as financial or healthcare applications, where robust security practices like encryption, authentication, and input validation are essential to mitigate risks effectively
• Related to: encryption, authentication

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Security Automation is a methodology while Security Through Obscurity is a concept. We picked Security Automation based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Security Automation wins

Based on overall popularity. Security Automation is more widely used, but Security Through Obscurity excels in its own space.