Security Automation vs Traditional Security Operations

Developers should learn and use Security Automation to enhance application and infrastructure security while maintaining development speed, particularly in DevOps and cloud-native environments meets developers should learn traditional security operations to understand foundational security principles, especially when working in legacy or regulated environments (e. Here's our take.

Security Automation

Nice Pick

Developers should learn and use Security Automation to enhance application and infrastructure security while maintaining development speed, particularly in DevOps and cloud-native environments

Pros

• It is crucial for automating repetitive security checks, such as scanning code for vulnerabilities, enforcing security policies in deployments, and responding to security incidents quickly
• Related to: devsecops, ci-cd-pipelines

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Traditional Security Operations

Developers should learn Traditional Security Operations to understand foundational security principles, especially when working in legacy or regulated environments (e

Pros

• g
• Related to: security-operations-center, incident-response

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Security Automation if: You want it is crucial for automating repetitive security checks, such as scanning code for vulnerabilities, enforcing security policies in deployments, and responding to security incidents quickly and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use Traditional Security Operations if: You prioritize g over what Security Automation offers.

The Bottom Line

Security Automation wins

Developers should learn and use Security Automation to enhance application and infrastructure security while maintaining development speed, particularly in DevOps and cloud-native environments