Security Compliance vs Security By Design

Developers should learn and apply security compliance when building or maintaining software that handles sensitive data, such as personal information, financial records, or healthcare data, to avoid legal penalties, data breaches, and reputational damage meets developers should adopt security by design when building applications that handle sensitive data (e. Here's our take.

Security Compliance

Nice Pick

Developers should learn and apply security compliance when building or maintaining software that handles sensitive data, such as personal information, financial records, or healthcare data, to avoid legal penalties, data breaches, and reputational damage

Pros

• It is essential in industries like finance, healthcare, and e-commerce, where regulatory requirements like PCI DSS or SOC 2 are mandatory for operations
• Related to: security-auditing, risk-management

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Security By Design

Developers should adopt Security By Design when building applications that handle sensitive data (e

Pros

• g
• Related to: threat-modeling, secure-coding

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Security Compliance is a concept while Security By Design is a methodology. We picked Security Compliance based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Security Compliance wins

Based on overall popularity. Security Compliance is more widely used, but Security By Design excels in its own space.