Security Manual Processes vs Security Automation

Developers should learn and use security manual processes when working in environments with strict regulatory requirements (e meets developers should learn and use security automation to enhance application and infrastructure security while maintaining development speed, particularly in devops and cloud-native environments. Here's our take.

Security Manual Processes

Nice Pick

Developers should learn and use security manual processes when working in environments with strict regulatory requirements (e

Pros

• g
• Related to: security-auditing, incident-response

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Security Automation

Developers should learn and use Security Automation to enhance application and infrastructure security while maintaining development speed, particularly in DevOps and cloud-native environments

Pros

• It is crucial for automating repetitive security checks, such as scanning code for vulnerabilities, enforcing security policies in deployments, and responding to security incidents quickly
• Related to: devsecops, ci-cd-pipelines

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Security Manual Processes if: You want g and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use Security Automation if: You prioritize it is crucial for automating repetitive security checks, such as scanning code for vulnerabilities, enforcing security policies in deployments, and responding to security incidents quickly over what Security Manual Processes offers.

The Bottom Line

Security Manual Processes wins

Developers should learn and use security manual processes when working in environments with strict regulatory requirements (e