Security Scanning vs Threat Modeling

Developers should learn and use security scanning to integrate security into the development lifecycle (DevSecOps), preventing costly breaches and ensuring compliance with standards like OWASP Top 10 or GDPR meets developers should learn and use threat modeling to build secure software by design, reducing the risk of costly security breaches and compliance issues. Here's our take.

Security Scanning

Nice Pick

Developers should learn and use security scanning to integrate security into the development lifecycle (DevSecOps), preventing costly breaches and ensuring compliance with standards like OWASP Top 10 or GDPR

Pros

• It's critical for use cases such as CI/CD pipelines to catch vulnerabilities early, auditing production environments for risks, and securing cloud infrastructure against common threats like misconfigured access controls
• Related to: devsecops, owasp-top-10

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Threat Modeling

Developers should learn and use threat modeling to build secure software by design, reducing the risk of costly security breaches and compliance issues

Pros

• It is particularly valuable in high-stakes environments like finance, healthcare, or critical infrastructure, where data protection is paramount
• Related to: security-engineering, risk-assessment

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Security Scanning is a tool while Threat Modeling is a methodology. We picked Security Scanning based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Security Scanning wins

Based on overall popularity. Security Scanning is more widely used, but Threat Modeling excels in its own space.