Security Vulnerability Management vs Security By Design
Developers should learn and implement Security Vulnerability Management to proactively address security flaws before they can be exploited, especially in DevOps and cloud-native applications where rapid deployment increases risk meets developers should adopt security by design when building applications that handle sensitive data (e. Here's our take.
Security Vulnerability Management
Developers should learn and implement Security Vulnerability Management to proactively address security flaws before they can be exploited, especially in DevOps and cloud-native applications where rapid deployment increases risk
Security Vulnerability Management
Nice PickDevelopers should learn and implement Security Vulnerability Management to proactively address security flaws before they can be exploited, especially in DevOps and cloud-native applications where rapid deployment increases risk
Pros
- +It's essential for roles involving secure software development, compliance (e
- +Related to: penetration-testing, threat-modeling
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
Security By Design
Developers should adopt Security By Design when building applications that handle sensitive data (e
Pros
- +g
- +Related to: threat-modeling, secure-coding
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
Use Security Vulnerability Management if: You want it's essential for roles involving secure software development, compliance (e and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.
Use Security By Design if: You prioritize g over what Security Vulnerability Management offers.
Developers should learn and implement Security Vulnerability Management to proactively address security flaws before they can be exploited, especially in DevOps and cloud-native applications where rapid deployment increases risk
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev