Self-Hosted CI vs GitHub Actions

Developers should use self-hosted CI when they need to maintain strict security and compliance, such as in regulated industries like finance or healthcare, or when working with sensitive code that cannot be exposed to third-party cloud services meets github actions is widely used in the industry and worth learning. Here's our take.

Self-Hosted CI

Nice Pick

Developers should use self-hosted CI when they need to maintain strict security and compliance, such as in regulated industries like finance or healthcare, or when working with sensitive code that cannot be exposed to third-party cloud services

Pros

• It's also beneficial for organizations with existing on-premises infrastructure, as it allows integration with internal tools and reduces reliance on external vendors, though it requires more setup and maintenance effort compared to cloud-based alternatives
• Related to: jenkins, gitlab-ci

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

GitHub Actions

GitHub Actions is widely used in the industry and worth learning

Pros

• Widely used in the industry
• Related to: ci-cd, github

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Self-Hosted CI if: You want it's also beneficial for organizations with existing on-premises infrastructure, as it allows integration with internal tools and reduces reliance on external vendors, though it requires more setup and maintenance effort compared to cloud-based alternatives and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use GitHub Actions if: You prioritize widely used in the industry over what Self-Hosted CI offers.

The Bottom Line

Self-Hosted CI wins

Developers should use self-hosted CI when they need to maintain strict security and compliance, such as in regulated industries like finance or healthcare, or when working with sensitive code that cannot be exposed to third-party cloud services