Self-Hosted Monitoring vs SaaS Monitoring

Developers should learn and use self-hosted monitoring when they need to maintain data sovereignty, comply with strict regulatory requirements (e meets developers should learn saas monitoring when building or maintaining cloud-native applications, microservices architectures, or distributed systems that require scalable, automated observability. Here's our take.

Self-Hosted Monitoring

Nice Pick

Developers should learn and use self-hosted monitoring when they need to maintain data sovereignty, comply with strict regulatory requirements (e

Pros

• g
• Related to: prometheus, grafana

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

SaaS Monitoring

Developers should learn SaaS Monitoring when building or maintaining cloud-native applications, microservices architectures, or distributed systems that require scalable, automated observability

Pros

• It is crucial for DevOps and SRE teams to ensure high availability, troubleshoot issues quickly, and meet service-level agreements (SLAs) in dynamic environments
• Related to: observability, apm

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Self-Hosted Monitoring is a tool while SaaS Monitoring is a platform. We picked Self-Hosted Monitoring based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Self-Hosted Monitoring wins

Based on overall popularity. Self-Hosted Monitoring is more widely used, but SaaS Monitoring excels in its own space.