Self-Hosted SMTP vs Mailgun

Developers should consider self-hosted SMTP when they need complete control over email infrastructure, such as for high-volume sending, custom routing, or compliance with strict data residency requirements (e meets developers should use mailgun when building applications that require reliable email sending, such as user registration confirmations, password resets, or marketing campaigns, as it simplifies email delivery and improves inbox placement rates. Here's our take.

Self-Hosted SMTP

Nice Pick

Developers should consider self-hosted SMTP when they need complete control over email infrastructure, such as for high-volume sending, custom routing, or compliance with strict data residency requirements (e

Pros

• g
• Related to: postfix, exim

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Mailgun

Developers should use Mailgun when building applications that require reliable email sending, such as user registration confirmations, password resets, or marketing campaigns, as it simplifies email delivery and improves inbox placement rates

Pros

• It's particularly valuable for startups and enterprises needing scalable, API-driven email services with robust analytics and compliance features like GDPR support
• Related to: email-api, transactional-email

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Self-Hosted SMTP is a tool while Mailgun is a platform. We picked Self-Hosted SMTP based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Self-Hosted SMTP wins

Based on overall popularity. Self-Hosted SMTP is more widely used, but Mailgun excels in its own space.