Self Hosted vs Serverless

Developers should consider self hosting when they need maximum control over data sovereignty, security, and customization, such as in industries like healthcare, finance, or government where strict regulations apply meets developers should learn serverless for building scalable, cost-effective applications with minimal operational overhead, especially for event-driven workloads like apis, data processing, or iot. Here's our take.

Self Hosted

Nice Pick

Developers should consider self hosting when they need maximum control over data sovereignty, security, and customization, such as in industries like healthcare, finance, or government where strict regulations apply

Pros

• It is also beneficial for cost management in long-term projects with predictable workloads, or for running open-source software without vendor lock-in
• Related to: devops, system-administration

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Serverless

Developers should learn Serverless for building scalable, cost-effective applications with minimal operational overhead, especially for event-driven workloads like APIs, data processing, or IoT

Pros

• It's ideal for microservices, sporadic traffic patterns, and rapid prototyping, as it reduces deployment complexity and optimizes costs by charging only for execution time
• Related to: aws-lambda, azure-functions

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Self Hosted is a methodology while Serverless is a concept. We picked Self Hosted based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Self Hosted wins

Based on overall popularity. Self Hosted is more widely used, but Serverless excels in its own space.