Self Hosting vs Serverless Computing

Developers should consider self hosting when they require complete control over their data, need to comply with strict privacy or regulatory requirements (e meets developers should learn serverless computing for building scalable, cost-effective applications with minimal operational overhead, especially for microservices, apis, and event-driven workflows. Here's our take.

Self Hosting

Nice Pick

Developers should consider self hosting when they require complete control over their data, need to comply with strict privacy or regulatory requirements (e

Pros

• g
• Related to: linux-system-administration, docker

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Serverless Computing

Developers should learn serverless computing for building scalable, cost-effective applications with minimal operational overhead, especially for microservices, APIs, and event-driven workflows

Pros

• It's ideal for use cases with variable or unpredictable traffic, such as web backends, data processing pipelines, and IoT applications, as it automatically scales and charges based on actual usage rather than pre-allocated resources
• Related to: aws-lambda, azure-functions

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Self Hosting is a methodology while Serverless Computing is a platform. We picked Self Hosting based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Self Hosting wins

Based on overall popularity. Self Hosting is more widely used, but Serverless Computing excels in its own space.