Server Side Logging vs Manual Debugging

Developers should implement Server Side Logging to troubleshoot production issues, track user behavior, and comply with security or regulatory requirements, such as auditing access logs meets developers should learn manual debugging to build a deep understanding of code execution and problem-solving skills, especially when working with legacy systems, embedded software, or in resource-constrained environments where debuggers are not supported. Here's our take.

Server Side Logging

Nice Pick

Developers should implement Server Side Logging to troubleshoot production issues, track user behavior, and comply with security or regulatory requirements, such as auditing access logs

Pros

• It is critical for applications with high availability needs, like e-commerce platforms or financial services, where real-time monitoring and historical analysis of server performance are necessary to prevent downtime and optimize resources
• Related to: log-aggregation, structured-logging

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Manual Debugging

Developers should learn manual debugging to build a deep understanding of code execution and problem-solving skills, especially when working with legacy systems, embedded software, or in resource-constrained environments where debuggers are not supported

Pros

• It is crucial for troubleshooting complex logic errors, performance issues, or bugs in production systems where automated tools might fail or provide limited insights
• Related to: debugging-tools, log-analysis

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Server Side Logging is a concept while Manual Debugging is a methodology. We picked Server Side Logging based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Server Side Logging wins

Based on overall popularity. Server Side Logging is more widely used, but Manual Debugging excels in its own space.