Server-Side Scripting vs Static Site Generation

Developers should learn server-side scripting to build data-driven web applications that require secure processing, such as user authentication, e-commerce transactions, and content management systems meets developers should use ssg for content-heavy sites like blogs, documentation, portfolios, and marketing pages where content changes infrequently, as it offers superior performance, security (no server-side vulnerabilities), and low hosting costs. Here's our take.

Server-Side Scripting

Nice Pick

Developers should learn server-side scripting to build data-driven web applications that require secure processing, such as user authentication, e-commerce transactions, and content management systems

Pros

• It is essential for handling sensitive operations that should not be exposed to clients, like database queries and server-side validation, ensuring better performance and security for complex applications
• Related to: node-js, php

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Static Site Generation

Developers should use SSG for content-heavy sites like blogs, documentation, portfolios, and marketing pages where content changes infrequently, as it offers superior performance, security (no server-side vulnerabilities), and low hosting costs

Pros

• It's ideal for projects requiring SEO optimization, global scalability via CDNs, and simplified deployment workflows, especially when combined with modern frameworks like Next
• Related to: next-js, gatsby

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Server-Side Scripting is a concept while Static Site Generation is a methodology. We picked Server-Side Scripting based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Server-Side Scripting wins

Based on overall popularity. Server-Side Scripting is more widely used, but Static Site Generation excels in its own space.