Serverless Architectures vs Traditional Servers

Developers should use serverless architectures when building event-driven applications, APIs, or microservices that require high scalability, cost efficiency, and minimal operational management meets developers should learn about traditional servers when working in legacy systems, on-premises deployments, or environments requiring strict data sovereignty and security compliance. Here's our take.

Serverless Architectures

Nice Pick

Developers should use serverless architectures when building event-driven applications, APIs, or microservices that require high scalability, cost efficiency, and minimal operational management

Pros

• It is ideal for workloads with variable or unpredictable traffic, such as web backends, data processing pipelines, or IoT applications, as it eliminates the need to provision and maintain servers, reducing time-to-market and infrastructure costs
• Related to: aws-lambda, azure-functions

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Traditional Servers

Developers should learn about traditional servers when working in legacy systems, on-premises deployments, or environments requiring strict data sovereignty and security compliance

Pros

• They are essential for understanding infrastructure fundamentals, such as networking, storage, and operating system management, which underpin more advanced cloud technologies
• Related to: linux, windows-server

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Serverless Architectures is a concept while Traditional Servers is a platform. We picked Serverless Architectures based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Serverless Architectures wins

Based on overall popularity. Serverless Architectures is more widely used, but Traditional Servers excels in its own space.