Dynamic

Service Locator Pattern vs Factory Pattern

Developers should learn the Service Locator Pattern when building applications that require loose coupling and centralized dependency management, such as in large enterprise systems or frameworks with complex service hierarchies meets developers should learn and use the factory pattern when they need to create objects without specifying the exact class of object that will be created, such as in scenarios involving multiple product types, dynamic object creation based on runtime conditions, or when adding new product types without modifying existing client code. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

Service Locator Pattern

Developers should learn the Service Locator Pattern when building applications that require loose coupling and centralized dependency management, such as in large enterprise systems or frameworks with complex service hierarchies

Service Locator Pattern

Nice Pick

Developers should learn the Service Locator Pattern when building applications that require loose coupling and centralized dependency management, such as in large enterprise systems or frameworks with complex service hierarchies

Pros

  • +It is particularly useful in scenarios where services need to be dynamically resolved at runtime, like in plugin-based architectures or when implementing inversion of control
  • +Related to: dependency-injection, inversion-of-control

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Factory Pattern

Developers should learn and use the Factory Pattern when they need to create objects without specifying the exact class of object that will be created, such as in scenarios involving multiple product types, dynamic object creation based on runtime conditions, or when adding new product types without modifying existing client code

Pros

  • +It is particularly useful in frameworks, libraries, and applications where object creation logic is complex or likely to change, such as in GUI toolkits, database connection management, or plugin systems
  • +Related to: design-patterns, object-oriented-programming

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Service Locator Pattern if: You want it is particularly useful in scenarios where services need to be dynamically resolved at runtime, like in plugin-based architectures or when implementing inversion of control and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use Factory Pattern if: You prioritize it is particularly useful in frameworks, libraries, and applications where object creation logic is complex or likely to change, such as in gui toolkits, database connection management, or plugin systems over what Service Locator Pattern offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
Service Locator Pattern wins

Developers should learn the Service Locator Pattern when building applications that require loose coupling and centralized dependency management, such as in large enterprise systems or frameworks with complex service hierarchies

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev