Dynamic

Session-Based Testing vs Automated Testing

Developers and testers should use Session-Based Testing when they need to quickly uncover defects in complex or poorly documented systems, such as during agile sprints or for ad-hoc testing of new features meets developers should learn and use automated testing to improve software reliability, reduce manual testing effort, and enable faster release cycles, particularly in agile or devops environments. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

Session-Based Testing

Developers and testers should use Session-Based Testing when they need to quickly uncover defects in complex or poorly documented systems, such as during agile sprints or for ad-hoc testing of new features

Session-Based Testing

Nice Pick

Developers and testers should use Session-Based Testing when they need to quickly uncover defects in complex or poorly documented systems, such as during agile sprints or for ad-hoc testing of new features

Pros

  • +It is particularly valuable for risk-based testing, where time is limited, as it allows focused, efficient exploration without rigid scripts, helping to identify edge cases and usability issues that scripted tests might miss
  • +Related to: exploratory-testing, test-management

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Automated Testing

Developers should learn and use automated testing to improve software reliability, reduce manual testing effort, and enable faster release cycles, particularly in agile or DevOps environments

Pros

  • +It is essential for regression testing, where existing functionality must be verified after code changes, and for complex systems where manual testing is time-consuming or error-prone
  • +Related to: unit-testing, integration-testing

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Session-Based Testing if: You want it is particularly valuable for risk-based testing, where time is limited, as it allows focused, efficient exploration without rigid scripts, helping to identify edge cases and usability issues that scripted tests might miss and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use Automated Testing if: You prioritize it is essential for regression testing, where existing functionality must be verified after code changes, and for complex systems where manual testing is time-consuming or error-prone over what Session-Based Testing offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
Session-Based Testing wins

Developers and testers should use Session-Based Testing when they need to quickly uncover defects in complex or poorly documented systems, such as during agile sprints or for ad-hoc testing of new features

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev