Dynamic

setup.cfg vs pyproject.toml

Developers should use setup meets developers should use pyproject. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

setup.cfg

Developers should use setup

setup.cfg

Nice Pick

Developers should use setup

Pros

  • +cfg when building Python packages to ensure consistent and reproducible builds, as it separates configuration from executable code, reducing errors and improving maintainability
  • +Related to: python, setuptools

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

pyproject.toml

Developers should use pyproject

Pros

  • +toml when working on Python projects that require consistent build and dependency management, especially for packaging and distribution with tools like pip, Poetry, or Flit
  • +Related to: python, poetry

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use setup.cfg if: You want cfg when building python packages to ensure consistent and reproducible builds, as it separates configuration from executable code, reducing errors and improving maintainability and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use pyproject.toml if: You prioritize toml when working on python projects that require consistent build and dependency management, especially for packaging and distribution with tools like pip, poetry, or flit over what setup.cfg offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
setup.cfg wins

Developers should use setup

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev