Shared Storage vs Object Storage

Developers should learn about Shared Storage when building distributed systems, cloud applications, or collaborative tools that require data consistency and accessibility across multiple nodes meets developers should learn and use object storage when building applications that require scalable, cost-effective storage for large volumes of unstructured data, such as media hosting, big data analytics, or backup solutions. Here's our take.

Shared Storage

Nice Pick

Developers should learn about Shared Storage when building distributed systems, cloud applications, or collaborative tools that require data consistency and accessibility across multiple nodes

Pros

• It is essential for scenarios like real-time data processing, multi-user databases, and scalable web services where centralized storage reduces redundancy and simplifies backup and recovery processes
• Related to: distributed-systems, cloud-computing

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Object Storage

Developers should learn and use object storage when building applications that require scalable, cost-effective storage for large volumes of unstructured data, such as media hosting, big data analytics, or backup solutions

Pros

• It is particularly valuable in cloud environments and microservices architectures, where its API-driven access and high durability support distributed systems and disaster recovery scenarios
• Related to: amazon-s3, google-cloud-storage

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Shared Storage is a concept while Object Storage is a platform. We picked Shared Storage based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Shared Storage wins

Based on overall popularity. Shared Storage is more widely used, but Object Storage excels in its own space.