Apache Shiro vs Pac4j

Developers should learn Apache Shiro when building Java applications that require robust security features without the complexity of larger frameworks like Spring Security meets developers should use pac4j when building java-based web applications that require robust, multi-protocol security without vendor lock-in, such as enterprise systems, saas platforms, or applications needing social login (e. Here's our take.

Apache Shiro

Nice Pick

Developers should learn Apache Shiro when building Java applications that require robust security features without the complexity of larger frameworks like Spring Security

Pros

• It's particularly useful for lightweight applications, legacy systems, or projects where fine-grained control over security is needed, such as custom authentication schemes or session management
• Related to: java, spring-security

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Pac4j

Developers should use Pac4j when building Java-based web applications that require robust, multi-protocol security without vendor lock-in, such as enterprise systems, SaaS platforms, or applications needing social login (e

Pros

• g
• Related to: java, spring-security

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Apache Shiro is a framework while Pac4j is a library. We picked Apache Shiro based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Apache Shiro wins

Based on overall popularity. Apache Shiro is more widely used, but Pac4j excels in its own space.