Solana Wallet Adapter vs WalletConnect

Developers should use Solana Wallet Adapter when building dApps on Solana that require user wallet interactions, such as for authentication, token transfers, or smart contract calls meets developers should learn walletconnect when building dapps that require user authentication, transaction signing, or wallet interactions, as it provides a seamless and secure connection method without requiring users to install browser extensions. Here's our take.

Solana Wallet Adapter

Nice Pick

Developers should use Solana Wallet Adapter when building dApps on Solana that require user wallet interactions, such as for authentication, token transfers, or smart contract calls

Pros

• It is essential for creating user-friendly web interfaces that support multiple wallet options without custom integration for each provider
• Related to: solana, web3-js

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

WalletConnect

Developers should learn WalletConnect when building dApps that require user authentication, transaction signing, or wallet interactions, as it provides a seamless and secure connection method without requiring users to install browser extensions

Pros

• It is essential for applications like DeFi platforms, NFT marketplaces, and blockchain games, where user engagement depends on easy wallet integration across mobile and desktop environments
• Related to: web3, ethereum

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Solana Wallet Adapter is a library while WalletConnect is a tool. We picked Solana Wallet Adapter based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Solana Wallet Adapter wins

Based on overall popularity. Solana Wallet Adapter is more widely used, but WalletConnect excels in its own space.