Solution Looking For A Problem vs Design Thinking

Developers should learn about SLFAP to avoid common pitfalls in software projects, such as building features no one needs or over-engineering solutions meets developers should learn design thinking to enhance collaboration with designers and stakeholders, ensuring products meet real user needs and improve usability. Here's our take.

Solution Looking For A Problem

Nice Pick

Developers should learn about SLFAP to avoid common pitfalls in software projects, such as building features no one needs or over-engineering solutions

Pros

• It is crucial when working in startups, product teams, or any environment where resource allocation and user satisfaction are priorities, as understanding this concept helps focus efforts on solving validated problems rather than chasing unproven ideas
• Related to: agile-methodology, lean-startup

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Design Thinking

Developers should learn Design Thinking to enhance collaboration with designers and stakeholders, ensuring products meet real user needs and improve usability

Pros

• It is particularly valuable in agile and cross-functional teams for creating user-centric software, mobile apps, and digital services, as it reduces rework by validating ideas early through prototyping
• Related to: user-experience-design, agile-methodology

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Solution Looking For A Problem is a concept while Design Thinking is a methodology. We picked Solution Looking For A Problem based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Solution Looking For A Problem wins

Based on overall popularity. Solution Looking For A Problem is more widely used, but Design Thinking excels in its own space.